Issues - (Part I) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
This
is perhaps the most significant question facing the modern world coming out of the past
and forging into the future. If we do not thoroughly understand the nature of social /
economic prosperity we can not hope to initiate it in the various countries of the world
who require our assistance. I have been thinking on this one for several weeks, years, etc. and this is what I have come up with: The best way to understand
the origin of economic prosperity is to track an example of it to it's origin. How was the modern world created? Ancient civilizations were not very prosperous. In fact the sum of Human history was never very prosperous until the advent of finance. I'm not exact on the time of finance's origin, but I do know that the Jewish people invented it. Finance changed the world's entire program of operation. Prior to finance leaders, usually religious and not too bright, instituted all change. It is important to note that change is the source of anything new. When finance came around it allowed every beast to participate in the process of instituting change. And it looks like this, just this, is the source of prosperity in the modern world. In other words the more beasts participating the faster change takes place and the more prosperous are the people. It appears, therefore, that the prosperity of a nation is a measure of the liberty of the citizens of that nation to participate in the economic process. This free participation which must encompass the sum of all human inclinations and anxieties gives rise to prosperity without any real guidance from outside other than restrictions on various anti social practices. Thus history was enhanced in an immeasurable way by the incorporation of finance as it allowed for the free expansion of opportunity within the entire population of humans. By this it becomes obvious that the liberty of the people is of utmost concern when seeking prosperity. It appears also that this liberty of the people which enhances the prosperity of nations takes it's effectiveness from just one incipient reality there in. That is the free mobility of select individuals. In other words prosperity is most rapid when all of the people can and are freely contributing to the economic process chiefly because it allows select, highly qualified, individuals to rise above the masses and provide precise guidance to various evolutionary impetuses. Thus the horrid dysfunctionalism of a system based on patrimony as it tends to, again, restrict these select individuals. Summary: Economic prosperity is most expedient when the select individuals who most thoroughly fit the current economic, evolutionary impetus are allowed to take their throne (figuratively) in the economic, evolutionary procession. Which implies that a qualification based system, as opposed to a patrimony based system, is not only beneficial but absolutely necessary to effect the greatest, and perhaps at times any, prosperity in a nation. Favoring anybody in particular, therefore, in the economic, evolutionary procession thus becomes a critical derailment of forward mobility. Even ones own children. Which identifies inheritance as a stringent social malady. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Death Of Class Struggle (top) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sync Error (top) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Once *status is secured ingenuity is no longer necessary except to maintain status and increase income. This gives rise to all the cheating, lying and faking, as it is the shortest path. Thus society descends in a spiral of maladjustment; which is what you see in the World today. Ingenuity results from necessity which decreases to the extent that *status is secured, progressively. The world's population is carrying too much dead weight but nobody can move because it's a Shut Down & Locked Out scenario. The only way out is to make things very insecure temporarily by breaking all bindings and allowing natural selection to readjust the resource distribution scenario in such a way as allows for the rise of qualified individuals. The definition of Sync Error The current level of evolution in production is such that it enables an advanced manifestation of Human instinct that is being restrained by the structure of society. In other words the structure of society is ready to change. See Zero Separation Cities for an idea of a more advanced structure. How *status is secured Locks, chains, fences, guard dogs, police, security guards, barred windows, secret meeting rooms, surveillance cameras, "circles of friends", "members only clubs", "inheritance", "trust funds". Chiefly by evading qualification based task assignments and all inclusion. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulative
competition is the soil which generates separatism. Separatism
like it's creator accumulative competition is a necessary stage in the development of a
civilized society. The reason this is so is that in the beginning of any organized system
everything is at odds with everything else. This is true until a system of cooperation is
found between the various constituents. Some systems find higher levels of cooperation
very rapidly, others find them very slowly. Any system consisting of more than one part
must enhance the level of cooperation between parts before it can expect to progress
beyond it's current state. Separatism serves as an addiction for many Humans. They run and hide in the woods or in the hills seeking freedom from the chaos which is a low level addiction (see addictions below) to happiness. By doing this they shelter themselves from further chaos and pain but also from further advancement. Human civilization has now reached the end of the free enterprise economy! As Karl Marx stated "What will become of capitalism once the historical conditions which gave rise to it no longer exist?" The historical conditions which gave rise to it having been "free exploitable resources". It was inevitable that the progression of civilization through the accumulative system of competition should reach this "end of free enterprise", after all available resources exist in finite quantity on a planet. So what do we see in these last days of the accumulative system? We see many things, but most prominent amidst them are the things which favor separatism they will have reached a summit precisely at this time, the end of free enterprise economy. Look around at all the locks, chains, fences, guard dogs, police, security guards, barred windows, and secret meeting rooms. It looks like society just woke up out of a nightmare in hell. More than 30% of the profits from the entire free enterprise system where wasted on these now obsolete devices. One can tell that nature has her forces at work, for even now, at this early stage, one can feel the pervasive silence as if the battle were over and all the warriors who fight and died to create what exists are gone. It could have been predicted by an astute observer. The battle field is clear and the citizens are as if lost not knowing if it is good or it is bad, if it is right or it is wrong, they tend their gardens and carry on with their daily rituals as if nothing has happened here at all. But it is the quiet before the storm I'm afraid for there is yet one battle to be fought and that is the battle of which philosophy tomorrow's level of cooperation amongst men will engender. I'm betting on UCOM, how about you. Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche - "One day my name will be associated with something catastrophic a crisis such as there has never been on earth, the most profound collision of conscience.... I'm not a man, I'm dynamite: When truth start battling with the lies of millennia we shall have convulsions, a spasm of earthquakes, a displacement of mountain and valley such as no one has dreamed of. The concept of politics will be assimilated wholly into ideological warfare, all the power structures of the old society will be blown up they are all founded on lies. There will be wars such as there have never been on earth." - 1980. "A CRITICAL LIFE." By Ronald Hayman |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Water flows down hill. Water always
flows down hill unless it is interrupted by something. When would we have to worry about
water not flowing down hill? If we put all kinds of obstructions in front of it's path
then we would have to worry about it not flowing down hill. We would need to implement
some security measures to ensure that it continues to flow down hill. Maybe surveillance
cameras to watch it constantly to ensure that it is still flowing down hill. And whatever
other security measures somebody with nothing better to do could come up with. But the
fact remains that water flows down hill which means essentially that if we strain its
downward flow with obstacles we will need to monitor it constantly to ensure it's
continued flow in the direction that it flows ordinarily without any monitoring. If we
heated the water up it might begin to evaporate so we would have to implement some type of
condensation chamber to force it to continue down hill where it naturally flows without
heat or condensation chambers. Water is a chemical substance. Animal life is an aggregation of chemical substances. The two are almost exactly the same, excepting that the second is slightly more complex. They both respond similarly to environmental conditions. Human instinct is ISM. Human instinct causes Humans to flow in particular directions. Without obstructions Human instinct, like the flow of water, will follow an exact, or very narrowly fluctuating, course. The key, therefore, to a functional economic system for Humans is very similar to the key for a functional downward flow of water; provide it with a channel free of obstacles. Once idiots start misplacing obstacles in the path of Human instinct it becomes necessary to monitor and control at first some human behavior then later more human behavior until at last everything is so damn maladjusted that humans can not be permitted to move except with a guide dog and a surveillance camera (where we are today in modern society). But the fact remains that Human instinct causes Humans to move in very narrowly fluctuating patterns just like water. The key therefore to a functional economic system for Humans is to provide a structure within which Human instinct can free flow (Zero Separation) and frankly "GET THE HELL OUT OF THE WAY"! Because like water, you can't stop it. You can only maladjusted it's performance temporarily until it again finds a way to circumvent your obstacles. The extent of existing security is directly linked to how maladjusted the economic and political scenario is. See Sync Error Millions of over paid fools scurry to and fro each day collecting huge pay checks and complementing themselves inordinately for doing things that don't even need to be done. Humans do not need "GUIDANCE"! What they need is a social structure which coincides with their instincts and I know that even this idea is beyond the comprehension of most of those working in such positions. You have to concede that something is drastically wrong when the best minds in society are "outside of society" and not even recognized by society as "citizens". Seventy percent of what exists here of administration and structure is obsolete! Much of it was obsolete at it's point of origin; just the maladjusted meandering of so many over rated, me centric fools in pursuit of self gain. I don't mean to be obnoxious but, man, they need to get a grip because this mess is about to crumble of misplaced strains in some places and an over abundance of inertia in most others. The entire idea of "Homeland Security" is insane (It's like the eyes rejecting the nose because their poor vision lead the face to a place where it stinks.). You had better just let the water flow before you're inundated by a torrential flood! And in the event that you are inundated by a torrential flood anyway, because the due date here is long past, certainly don't fight it unless you think your eye sight is better than natures. And I'm sure there are those who do, even though they themselves are no more than it. |
.
.
.
.
.
.
.