Views - (Part I)

Race (top)  

Advantages Produce Apparent Differences.

Some separatist groups in our civilization want there to be only one race. They are divided somewhat on which race that should be. I think it is a bowl of shit. Nature created this vast diversity, of Human types, because she wants it. It will probably happen that we will become progressively similar in the future and that is O.K. with me because the more alike we are the less bull shit we will have separating us. But, I know that nature will keep spinning off genetic exceptions, it is her MO. The race of a person is not so important when considering or implementing a cooperative economic system as is the unity of philosophy. Sure people, in ignorance, will have disputes and try to divide on the racial lines, but sooner or later such things will become so utterly ridiculous that they will just stop pouting and surrender to the reality of whatever situation they find themselves within that caused them to pout.

Presently on this planet of ours, all of ours, there is too much racism. The popular view is "I'm not a racist", so everybody is towing the party line, but I have specific knowledge in this area and they are not being honest with themselves or others. Wealth and economics did not develop with a uniform distribution between all races on this planet. I have become quite certain that the conditions of certain races having the tremendous economic advantages that they do on this planet is almost entirely, 98%, a result of mere geographical considerations. Some people, and selected studies indicate that there are genetic differences of intelligence and so forth. I have a very deep suspicion that the people who rank highest on those tests are in fact the creators of the tests which indicates more than a truthful relationship between people's scores and who is doing the testing. 

I have many times in the past indicated that geographical conditions were the primary, I would now say "only", conditions underlying the economic level of any race on this planet. It is too obvious when looking at a globe of this planet to note the coincidence of what is called "Third World" with what is called "Slightly Inhabitable Tropics". The region which falls within 22 degrees north and south latitude. Furthermore, Europeans, who by and large call themselves "white" and stand as the benefactors of the "greatest economic wealth" in modern civilization can be shown to have, coincidentally, had several historical geographical advantages. 

The primary advantage of the "whites" was the lack of severe competition for the food supply in cold northern geographical regions. It is easy to see that mammals, who are not usually so fierce, survive and advance better when isolated from dangerous predators. Just look at the skin of the people and you can see how much of an advantage of this type, isolation from dangerous predators, their predecessors had. Brown skinned people obviously struggled with a multitude of dangerous predators nearer to the tropical regions than did lighter skinned people who, obviously, were not near the tropics. 

(If you know nothing of the tropics you may not understand this. In the tropics or progressively as we approach more and more nearly the tropical regions of this planet from the north or south poles the temperature rises and microbial life flourishes in progressively greater abundances. Also insect life flourishes in progressively greater abundances. And from this basis you can readily extrapolate the abundance of predatory life which would, and did, necessarily evolve to consume this abundance of microbial and insect life. Completely overlooking the abundance of foliage in the tropical regions which is a tremendous factor. )

One distinct trait which seems to have resulted from this is  the "white" tendency to seek complacency and isolation. A bad trait when trying to cooperate in an economy. It breeds Accumulative Competitors who have no sense of Distributive Competition. Brown skinned people tend to be more stable with a bit of conflict in their daily lives, perfectly suitable for cooperating an economic system. So it is that whites have the advantages, but browns have a superior ability to cooperate.

Another coincidental geographical advantage "white" races had in the process of gaining an economic advantage was being in, or near, a dominant throughway of ancient civilization. Most of Europe is central to the locations where the isolated races of mankind evolved. To the north were Caucasians, to the east were Asians, Indians, to the south were Africans, in the middle, well you're looking at it, a mixture. Mixture is important and it stands till this day as a coincidental geographical economic advantage of what is nowadays called "whites". As necessity is the mother of invention and diversity the shortest path to evolution, ancient European conflicts brought on unprecedented Human advancement. The perennial conflict made it necessary for constant deep thought to maintain survival. The race mixing brought on additional conflict and new ways of looking at everything. It happens that Europeans advanced far beyond the other, isolated, peoples of this planet.

From these two coincidental advantages alone one can derive all the present economic advantages of the white European races. On the one hand they were in the temperate geographical zone, and on the other they were in the heat of constant battle with their fellow Humans. Even the smallest economic advantage can work itself out into creating a more technically advanced people, or at least that is what they will be called being as they are in fact the ones controlling the distribution of titles, merits and credits. This indicates that genetics probably means almost nothing in the establishment of wealth and culture of any race of people on this planet. On the contrary it was all geographical location. And once Europeans arrived at the point where they were calling themselves "the most technically advanced" they set the criteria for all qualification obviously to suit their uniquely advantaged predicament. What they did not and could not consider was that they might, as a result of the lethargy born of luxury, begin to diverge tangentially from reality in their values and interpretations of reality. They now stand as almost completely obsolete statues impeding the wheels of progress, trying to maintain prehistoric economic advantages; in so far as the accuracy and relevancy of their productivity is concerned whilst moving into a truly cooperative world economic scenario.

Synopsis:

Racism is a foolish and dangerous phenomena but we have a long way to go before we are free of it. If you just say "I'm not a racist" it is not enough, because unless you actually think these matters out, as I have done for you here, you simply can not interrelate and operate with other races on a realistic level which is to say on the level that we are, in fact, exactly equal only previous geographical conditions have given anyone more of an economic advantage than the others. If there is an incidence, in particular races, of low intelligence then it has to do with opportunity not genetics. It happens that a people in perennial struggle for the basic requirements of life, namely food, would simply not have time to sit back and ask slovenly questions before breeding, like "Is this man adequately intelligent to breed with?" Provided with adequate food, water and shelter all races can prove to have the exact same or very similar levels of intelligence in their ranks.

And the foolish longing after purity, inspired by religions, caused all this infatuation with whiteness. Nothing is good about being an albino..

You might say "look he's white" and "look how smart he is", but before you go down that genetic distinction line remember all the advantages my race has had and for so many hundreds of years. If one of the whites is not "literally brilliant" and "setting the intellectual pace of thought" then there is Definitely something very wrong with that one, under the circumstances.

Abortion (top)

A Mother has rights also.

You could say "A child has a right to live", but then I could counter with "Not if a woman don't give it that right". So what's in the womb is a woman's issue. What's out of the womb and in a cradle is a social issue. I personally believe that the world is grotesquely under populated but let no law stand which forces a certain Mother or Hades forbid "All Mothers" to act according to a predetermined plan on issues concerning their own personal health, welfare, and future. To do such a thing is to capture women and render them subservient to the public ideal and that is slavery.

So Mothers, please give us more and more children! But if in the course of your most admirable contribution to Human life, "Human Life", you find it necessary to reject the life that you carry for your own personal reasons then it is your prerogative.

Television (top)

Don't get into the habit of watching others live.

Television is addictive and as such should be registered as a vice. I would guess that 60% of the modern world's population is completely addicted to television. They have bad health, mostly obesity, and few if any interests of their own. Like a zombie mob they go to their jobs and return to their televisions locking the windows and doors because they fear the world they live in for never having seen it except through their television.

If you watch television every day you have a problem and should immediately confront the issue by creating a schedule which regulates your television time and sticking to it.

Do not allow television or any other addiction to rule your life. If you do you are no better than a common heroine addict. Just because everybody else is using heroine, or television, doesn't make it the right thing to do.

Control your own life and mind, at least to some extent. You don't have to be an Albert Einstein, but you certainly should have some interests of YOUR OWN! Use television as a tool to learn, or occasional source of entertainment, but certainly NOT everyday of every week of every year of your life. If you do you will not have much of a life of your own and you will not be contributing to the overall progress of social evolution because you aren't living. I recommend computers over television because computers are interactive.

UCOM's views on television therefore are: Use sparingly if at all, regulate it as you would any addiction.

Immigration (top)

Are you a native American Indian.

Nobody owns this planet!

And as far as the USA is concerned the native American Indians were the first to colonize this area, so if anybody has a right to be denying anybody else entry it is them only. But "isn't it ironic" - got to love her, how some Europeans look at Indian reservations in this country and their inhabitants as 'illegal aliens", inferiors, and worse as beggars on their own land.

The bottom line is cooperation.
We are all on this planet together!
This is what we have and we MUST SHARE, or else there will be WAR!

After considering ecological issues, all species which immediately compete with human populations for their food supply should be considered for relegation to the haploid cell storage facilities.

The ecology of marine life is of great importance to human society as the oceans of the Earth provide an excellent food source, fish, and they produce that food without requiring any of our limited land surface area. Some ocean dwelling creatures directly compete with humans for the food supply, the existence of those creatures should be relegated to the haploid cell storage facilities and zoos. One creature in this category is seals. Seals consume large quantities of marine animals that humans also consume and as such are an obstacle to increased human populations as they themselves are not consumed by humans. 

Homosexuality (top)

It isn't a crime.

What we need to unify is PHILOSOPHY, NOT the entire scope of Human reality. People always arrive at the easiest conclusions first when they go out looking for solutions. For example: When the first thunderstorm hit the first Human cave village I'm almost certain they said "The Heavens Are Angry". I know damn well they didn't say "A Low Pressure System Is Passing Over The Caves".

Don't go looking for things to be this way or that way. Expand your horizons to include a vast and diverse universe of possibilities because that is what we are faced with in life. I'm not saying everybody should jump on the Homosexuality train, because, quite frankly, I see the notion as suicidal, after all without male - female sex where do the children come from? What I'm saying is that not everybody is concerned with bearing and raising children or conventional family life and to that I say: Amen!

In summary:
If some people like being homosexual then why should anybody else care? After all it leaves more girls for the rest of us. Homosexuals are usually a bit more pleasant and jolly than hard knuckle male macho bozos. But I'm not a homosexual, I love women far to much - (even though I don't get any), but leave the homosexuals alone. Stop trying to simplify life because it needs all this complexity, and believe you me you haven't seen the least of it yet.

World Domination (top)

Ten Steps To Cerebral Concision

Fortunately I finally realized "what time it is".

Let me just ask you a few basic questions and you may wake up also:

1. What is the nature of the Human beast? ISM and does it say anyplace in there that we do everything we do for somebody else?
   Answer: No it does not. Cooperation is necessary to expedite overall progress, but it relies on independent ambition.
2. What is the accepted policy of granting titles everywhere in nature?
   Answer: He who comes first is first.
3. Who can match the administrative aptitude and ambition for administrating of those who came first?
   Answer: Nobody, because nature herself has designed them such that they have no choice from birth to death but to prove themselves successful administrators. Unlike the general PC class who don't have to live up to much of anything and usually don't.
4. If you have a pocket full of free spending cash and you "go out on the town" who is the boss?
   Answer: You. Why? Because it's Human nature (ISM). Tyranny is pent up in the nature of all beasts. It never surfaces immediately, but eventually it does and when it does nature knows exactly what to do; Revolution. Or did you think that all of previous history was no example of the future. Or maybe we should just completely stop all history because we object to it's natural procession?
5. What is the most stable form of government?
   Answer: A Kingdom. How can we tell? Primarily because nature has chosen it as the main form of government for all of Human history except the past 500 or so years. But to suit our wanton curiosities: It completely eliminates petty rivalry and patrimony as social impediments because they are reduced to irrelevant.
6. If you absolutely had to deal with tyrants how many would you like to deal with: 100,000,000 or about 5,000?
   Answer: 5,000 should have been your answer as 100,000,000 is far too many fat, big mouths to feed and dress. In a population of 5 billion plus the extravagance of 5,000 would likely go completely unnoticed, whereas the extravagance of 100,000,000 becomes a major hindrance to the existence of the citizenry.
7. Who made this planet and these people?
   Answer: Nature. Which means essentially that we really don't have any say in the matter anyhow. We are biochemical machinery operating within the constraints there of. See A Few Words On Evolution
8. If there were no illuminati, (more appropriately called number one citizens), what would eventually result?'
   Answer: A new set of number one citizens. The exact same thing you see now. Why? Because evolution has created these echelons for a reason (see Wealth Disparity). We would just prolong the suffering of the citizenry for another 500 years. And frankly nature wouldn't tolerate it.
9. If you are driving down a long road and eventually you come up on a locked gate which is blocking the road what do you do?
   Answer: Try to get it open so you can get through.
10. If you are driving down a long road and eventually you come up on a solid brick wall which is blocking the road what do you do?
    Answer: Turn around and go back because you're obviously going the wrong way.

Anarchy (top)

Until Humanity Is Fully Unified Structure Will Need To be Secured by Governance

What we know as government, and have known as government, is obsolete, but that does not mean that we can forfeit all social structure and revert to the tribalism of Anarchy. Instead we must implement a new form of governance and elevate our way of life to a uniform, all inclusive, minimal cost - maximum return, more concise level.

It has cost too much time and too much bloodshed to get to the point we are now at to even consider retrogression, even if it were an option. The reality of this issue is that it is not an option and evolution will proceed from this point forward to the next regardless of Human opinion.

Until the entire Human race is fully unified on the most important issues: philosophy, linguistics, race, and civilization is fundamentally all inclusive there will be unproductive tides in civilization which will surface by way of abnormal individuals as will the productive tides. 

Thus governance is necessary, but we certainly don't need a thousand over paid bureaucrats running in circles trying to decide which fashionable tie they will wear to the next governor's dinner party to discus the budget over sirloin steak and champagne returning next week only to find that they have spent 10% of the budget on the trip and never found a resolution. Have you ever heard the saying "Too many cooks spoil the soup". Well, we have seen the truth in it in modern government.

Wealth Disparity (top)

Until We Are All Equally Qualified Specialized Abilities Will Need To Be Rewarded

Tobacco (top)

Tobacco products have been with humans for millennia

There are two reasons why tobacco is a special case:

1. The first place the government dynasty sought to "protect the health of the people" by eliminating tobacco was in the penal system, prisons, jails. This is odd considering that those are precisely the people that the government dynasty wants to eliminate.
2. It turns out that the mild stimulant in tobacco, nicotine, has much more profound activity on bacteria than it does on Human beings. Nicotine is a lethal poison to nearly every group of bacteria which infect the Human respiratory system.

I'm personally a tobacco chewer. I have been chewing tobacco for the past 23 years and for all of that time I have swallowed the tobacco juices which result from chewing the tobacco. Coincidentally, I haven't been sick, not once, in all those twenty three years. I still chew tobacco today and I still never get sick. I have watched the people around me struggling with sore throats, cold, etc. etc. for years but I never get any of it. Prior to chewing tobacco, in my teenage years, I had caught pneumonia twice  on two separate occasions and almost died. Never since.

Now with this knowledge in hand it becomes a bit more clear why the government dynasty has completely banned all tobacco products in all American jails. It is very hard for prisoners to "coincidentally catch respiratory sicknesses" when they use tobacco products. 

They finally passed a law giving the FDA permission to "regulate" the nicotine content of tobacco products. Phillip Morris, one of the tobacco giants (PC Dynasty), was even backing the proposal, umm... what does that tell us. They don't want to cut down the smoke, or resins that coat the lungs and cause lung damage, but they want to regulate the nicotine content, the active ingredient in the resin that protects you from bacteria. Looks like a lot more people are going to be dying from tobacco products. They had already raised the prices on tobacco products so high that it is a burden to use tobacco and that also is very coincidental when you realize that alcohol does much more damage but a can of beer still cost $1 just as it did ten years ago, whereas a can of chewing tobacco now costs $5 when ten years ago it was eighty cents.

Smoking can cause lung damage, but chewing tobacco is harmless provided you move the tobacco around in your mouth occasionally so it doesn't wear holes in your gums. Like I said I have chewed tobacco for twenty three years and far from dieing of cancer it has kept me from ever becoming sick.