Views - (Part II)

Self Confidence (top)

Self Confidence As A Disease

Nothing is so wasteful as to spend one's life in the perpetual bliss and self absorption of self confidence, it causes those so afflicted to completely overlook the complexities of life and living as "unfashionable oddities" and resign themselves to their innate superiority without regard for such trivialities.

The PCs look at self confidence as a gauge of personal value: a man with a high level of self confidence is by them considered to be a man of high value, whereas the opposite is also true in their distorted perceptions. They therefore instill in their offspring an  inordinate, unjustifiably, high level of self confidence which, in turn, enables their offspring to exploit, rape, rob and pillage with a sense of superiority to those being exploited, raped, robbed.

Humans use many ways of boosting egos; from religion to excesses of mother love, and the vast accumulation of various resources. Having a high level of self confidence implies that a person has a strong sense of meaningfulness. Having a strong sense of meaningfulness is not a problem provided you exist within a functional social framework which provides this meaningfulness as a result of achievements. On the other hand if a Human lives within a non functional social framework (the current framework) and is deriving his/her strong sense of meaningfulness from some source other than achievement they are thereby rendered an anti social monster. Although such Humans are always completely enmeshed within some social network, it is the device which creates them and serves as the means to destroying itself. Quite the opposite of the PC propaganda which paints anti social monsters as solitary loners; although this doesn't imply that such persons do not exist just that their prevalence is minuscule by comparison. 

This is true because the quest for meaningfulness is the driving force behind all accomplishments up and above those which maintain basic survival and advancement is necessary if the social framework is non functional (not all inclusive is non functional). The quest for meaningfulness is also the necessity which awakens concern for one's fellows which in a non functional, non all inclusive, social framework would be a preliminary to finding feasible solutions.

So distorted has the general perception of American society become that they are medicating people who experience self doubt as if it were an illness and not the source of all solutions that it is. This indicates that prevailing values are out of synchronization with reality.

Western religion's me centric approach is insufficiently congruent with universal reality to remain functional whilst moving into a fully participating global economy. It is the ideology of spooks, boogie men, superficiality, cults and isolationism and has no place in a fully participating global economy. Even so a high percentage of the modern world's citizens and all of it's media are still parading it around like some sadistic insanity.

Pets (top)

The Human Emotions Arise From The Human Quest For Meaningfulness

There are two reasons why Humans keep pets:

1. As security devices. (Guard dogs, etc.)
2. As companions. (pretty, well cared for pets)

As pertains to case number one: 

The necessity for security devices is pent up in particular stages in the development of production, namely - the final stage of each level.

As pertains to case number two:

The human emotions arise from the human quest for meaningfulness. The Human quest for meaningfulness results from the Human awareness of self. To experience an awareness of self, or be self aware - as differentiated from pure instinctual interactivity, a beast must have an advanced brain capacity. To my knowledge the only beast on Earth which possesses any measurable quantity of self awareness is the Human. Therefore, Humans possess emotion.

It might be possible that some beasts less complex than Humans experience trifle glimpses of self awareness. If it is true it would be true amongst those beasts, less complex than Humans, which posses high intelligence, relative to other beasts less complex than Humans. More On the issue of complexity. Although, for the most part the pets that Humans maintain simply do not have emotions. Humans frequently mistake the herd instinct of their pets for affection. Beasts of the field, dogs, cats, birds, or all beasts less complex than Humans, tend to gather around the power center, or the strongest beast, simply as a source of self security. The Earth manifests a complex myriad of phenomena and nearly every beast on Earth is to some extent and or occasionally in fear of the unknown. As any child clings to it's parent for protection, so also do some pets cling to Humans for protection if they perceive the Human as a superior strength.

Therefore, in the second case, above, the companionship derived from pets is for all practical purposes a one sided relationship. That is, Humans can have emotions for the pet, but the pet can not have emotions for the Human. It is impossible, the pet operates on pure instinct without reasoning. After having a pet for many years and caring for it. People tend to assume that there is some emotional bonding between themselves and the pet. It is not true. There is only the pursuit of survival, habit, and instinct for pets. Which is not to say that the Human did not develop some emotion for the pet, it simply states that the emotion is one sided; not common between Human and pet.

Of course, as it is, everything being separated, and Human cooperation being thereby dwarfed to almost invisible, the utilization of pets as an illusory solution to Human emotional needs can be justified as the maladjusted, partially formed implement of Human social evolution that it is. Even so, to exchange our emotions with less complex beasts who do not even possess emotion is not only a waste of Human compassion but a drag on social functionalism as it displaces resources which would otherwise be directed to the further enhancement of Humans as opposed to less complex beasts, or pets. Pets, like religion cost Humans far more than the price of their maintenance. They cause Humans to overlook the further development of social organizations which would otherwise serve to more appropriately solve those aspects of the Human condition.

Consequently, The great number of pets being maintained by Humans within civilization is, again, an indicator of a certain amount of Insanity which exists in civilization as a result of mix matching incompatible things in vain efforts to implement solutions to misunderstood problems, such as ISM.

Individuality (top)

Individuality can not be suppressed!

The solution is not restraining Human volition; except as it pertains to disparaging social practices, such as the pursuit of inordinate excess. 

The solution is eliminating excesses, useless ornamentation, inheritance, leveling wages, limiting wealth, zero separation, unification of philosophy, and revaluation which centers on concision and productive elements.

Population Growth (top)

Population Growth Is Only A Problem In A Poorly Structured Economy

Population growth is most torrential when the people exist in a meandering state of economy. One where some participate while most remain inactive (the present state of economy). In the economy of the future we will have full participation and full participation will undermine excessive propagation.

Furthermore, the economy of the future will allow everyone to engage their chosen field of interest and this also will serve to further undermine excessive propagation by relogating the focus of the citizenry to things which might interest them more than propagation.

Eventually the entire population problem will be an issue of the past as values will have changed such that things other than propagation will take on a more dazzling appeal in the minds of the citizenry. Chiefly, their civilization and their participation there in. Which is what they are trying to achieve now through excessive propagation. It is just a poor alignment of circumstance and judgement.

Consequently the entire issue of "over population" was just a trumped up meandering of those with neither better insightfulness towards the reality of the problem or judgement in instituting the necessary transformations in the structure of human society and economics.