One People

What Does One People Mean?

1. Nature set the standard which makes it necessary for all Humans to unite as One People. So if you think it is some conspiracy of a select group in society you're fooling yourself.
2. To effectively unify Humanity it will be necessary to completely abolish separatism amongst Humans on this earth.

Those things said I will explain a bit more precisely what these things mean, or what they will look like working themselves out in Human society in the future.

1. Ultimately everything in the universe is already united and can not be separated. But serving the irrationality of Human ignorance it, which will be necessary until our philosophical understanding merges with natural truth, is necessary to ascend the inclusion ladder by gradations as our understanding advances. It is time to include all Human beasts in our unification strategy. The only real reason that this is necessary is that Humans can and will fight for their liberty and the only way to surmount this perennial turmoil is to immediately include us all. Or we can play hide and seek for another 1000 years trying to exploit each other making little or no progress. It would be a fools choice. (actually it is the illusion of choice)
2. Abolishing separatism runs a little deeper than you might have imagined. Political boundaries are separatist units. Races are a separatist unit. One on one relationships are separatist units. Families are separatist units. The ownership of private property is a separatist mode of social life. At some point in the future all of these things will have vanished from Human society. 

Nature is completely dynamic. This implies that nothing can be tied down in any way and allow for the fluid evolution of Human civilization. When the unification of Humanity is near complete each Human will be nearly the same as each other Human and I would assume completely interchangeable with each other. The word friends implies distinctions which will not exist. Every man and woman will be the friend of every other man and every other woman and the word friend will be reduced thereby to meaningless and irrelevant. The thing that people call friendship today is no more than common lot meandering. Meandering itself will no longer exist in the future. All of Humanity will stand in the future as it always has essentially; as individual enemy units collaborating for the sum effect and held in check by the reality of impending conflict. Beasts of the field already live by this principal, but Human beasts must come to an understanding of the necessity for it within an organized social structure. 

All this affectation, petty sympathizing and showing of favoritism will have vanished as the useless nonsense that it is. The need for affectation will have vanished to expedite economics. Human kind will engage their economy with their every waking breath, similar to the ant. Engaging our economy with every waking breath is not a bad thing, after all sharing love is a portion of our economy as is every other aspect of Human life. All that will have changed is that we will have become far more concise with a unified vision of who, what and where we are and the shortest route to traverse in obtaining what we need to arrive at our common destination. Our common destination being at life, liberty and progress for the greatest number of Humans. The minimalists would have us reduce all such goals to a level that doesn't strain their obese bodies but nature doesn't delegate a reduction of anything but rather an increase until everything is strained to it's limit. It is the reality of all nature, the will to power and proliferation. We certainly do not want population growth to dictate the general Human condition, but we are all capable of far more than we are currently contributing to social progress and thus the population is far short of what it could be under more organized conditions. When juxtaposing a narrow limit on population against the urgency for better cooperation and organization evolution will push cooperation and organization to their limit before she ponders limiting population. It, as most other things, appears to be a matter of choice but really it is not.

These evolutionary processes can neither be evaded or delayed so don't waste your time trying, if you happen to be a rich person. Better you attempt to ensure that Humanity will actually reach these points in its evolution and not be destroyed by some catastrophe of nature. For all the efforts of every previous civilization and it's rulers to evade the evolutionary erosion of time we can see nothing was accomplished for time has passed and evolution has been perpetual. Sooner or later we will get a set of rulers who realize this, and if they are completely dynamic in their understanding of it they will be the last rulers of this planet.